• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

This view of service management...

On the origin and the descent of managing services. We put meat on the bones.

  • Kanban eLearning
  • Services
    • Kanban Software Solutions
    • Consulting & Coaching
    • Training & Seminars
  • Posts
  • Events
    • Events – Agenda View
    • Events – Calendar View
    • International Service Management Calendar
  • Publications
    • Our Publications
    • Notable Publications
    • Quotes
  • Subscribe

Can we really not multi-task?

27 May 2014 by Robert Falkowitz Leave a Comment

Can the human brain multi-task?

The loss of efficiency and effectiveness due to context switching among various tasks is one of the underpinning tenets of why a Kanban approach helps organizations to reduce the lead times of their work. But is it really true that the human brain cannot multi-task?

The Internet is full of pop “experts” who proclaim that the brain cannot multi-task, as if they really had any knowledge of the subject. It would be interesting to have a better grasp of the reality of how the brain can work, rather than depend on the muddle promulgated by such folklore. I am not a neurologist and do not pretend to have the answers to these questions, but I do have sufficient powers of ratiocination to know when others, even scientists, are somehow missing the point.

It’s a higher brain function issue

Whether or not it is useful to try to understand the brain via the analogy of a binary electronic data processor is moot. But let us take for granted that the brain has various types of storage, does perform input and output operations and also does some type of processing in between those inputs and outputs. Now, since many of us can both walk and chew gum at the same time, it is obvious that some form of multi-tasking is eminently possible. So the issue is restricted to some of the higher brain functions.

Rapid context switching vs. true multi-tasking

Researchers tell us that the brain is good at switching contexts very rapidly, giving the impression of a certain degree of multi-tasking. Some use the example of the short order cook. As I have done this sort of work professionally, I have some first hand experience that helps me assess the situation. And I would agree that a professional cook may be successful due to the ability to rapidly switch contexts, without data loss or confusion, rather than due to true multi-tasking. But the experiments that support this view concern issues of perception, or how the brain handles certain types of sense input. So these experiments are really only relevant to the I/O functions, not to the processing that might be occurring in between the input and the output.

If music be the food of multi-tasking, play on

Can we identify any cases of higher functions that are examples of true multi-tasking? Again, I think the answer is “yes”. The principal example that comes to mind is in the performance of music. Instrumentalists in an orchestra must simultaneously produce their own music, while hearing many other instruments and ensuring that all are coordinated. Once again, I speak from many years of direct experience. A singing guitar player must simultaneously control a hand that strums, a different hand and fingers that position themselves along the neck of the guitar and also a voice, often having a rhythm and a melody different from that of the guitar. A pianist, too, coordinates two hands and ten fingers, each playing different notes, different rhythms and reading two different notation systems. The poly-rhythmic requirements can become quite sophisticated, with one hand playing triplets, or even quintuplets, against the rhythm of the other hand in 4/4 time. Think of the earlier music of Stravinsky, whose Sacré du printemps is filled with staccato cords timed to defy any notions of predictable timing. Charles Ives takes this principle to an extreme. In short, musicians not only multi-task; they must simultaneously coordinate complex physical movements with acoustic properties and esthetics.

An acquired skill

Most interesting about multi-tasking in the production of music is that it is generally an acquired skill, even if the art may come separately. Debutants, who might readily produce a beautiful one-part song, tend to be no good at all at multi-part music. As the man said, to get to Carnegie Hall takes practice.

What does this mean for Kanban and for work in general? In my view, it means that we should not take for granted that context switching among tasks will necessarily cause major increases in lead times. I would agree that there is abundant proof that the typical team doing knowledge work performs much better when work in progress is limited. But could this be because we have not yet found out how to acquire the skills needed to multi-task knowledge work efficiently and effectively? To use another analogy, one might create a sports team from a group of natural athletes. But they will be hopeless as team unless they have learned the specific skills of the sport and how to work together, all requiring extensive training, coaching and practice. The challenge, then, is to learn how to multi-task effectively, given that we do multi-task in certain contexts and can produce beautiful results.

Limited WIP will remain valuable

I do not know if we will readily find out how to multi-task more efficiently. Until that time, limiting work in progress is a proven strategy for delivering results more frequently and more quickly. And even we reached that nirvana where single-tasking and multi-tasking the same batch of work would take the same amount of time, there are still numerous benefits to limiting batch size and work in progress. Kanban has a long future ahead of it.

Summary
Can we really not muulti-task?
Article Name
Can we really not muulti-task?
Description
Can the human brain multi-task? The loss of efficiency and effectiveness due to context switching among various tasks is one of the underpinning tenets of why a Kanban approach helps organizations to reduce the lead times of their work. But is it really true that the human brain cannot multi-task?
Author
Robert S. Falkowitz
Publisher Name
Concentric Circle Consulting
Publisher Logo
Concentric Circle Consulting

Filed Under: Kanban Tagged With: Charles Ives, context switching, Igor Stravinsky, kanban, multi-tasking, WIP, work in progress

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • xing
  • YouTube

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Kanban eLearning

Kanban training online

Recent Posts

  • The Three Indicators
  • Visualization of Configurations
  • How to increase visualization maturity

Tag Cloud

value stream adaptive case management service request waste knowledge work priority lean management kanban board rigidity resource liquidity value Incident Management change management agility agile flow efficiency knowledge management risk kanban Cost of Delay bias problem flow process metrics change control service manager service management tools incident ITIL impact Service Management automation manifesto incident management tools manifesto for software development process definition urgency context switching lean cause
  • Kanban eLearning
  • Services
  • Posts
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Rights & Duties
  • Personal Data

© 2014–2021 Concentric Circle Consulting · All Rights Reserved.
Concentric Circle Consulting Address
Log in

This site uses cookies . You accept those cookies when you continue to use this site. Cookie policyAllow cookiesNo 3rd party non-functional cookiesCookie policy
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.Change cookie settings