• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

This view of service management...

On the origin and the descent of managing services. We put meat on the bones.

  • Kanban eLearning
  • Services
    • Kanban Software Solutions
    • Consulting & Coaching
    • Training and Seminars
  • Posts
  • Events
    • Events – Agenda View
    • Events – Calendar View
    • International Service Management Calendar
  • Publications
    • Our Publications
    • Notable Publications
    • Quotes
  • About us

Principles for Billing for Services

9 January 2014 by Robert Falkowitz 4 Comments

Criteria for How to Bill for Services

When billing for services, a principle should be adopted that is simple, unambiguous, complete, fair, sustainable and strategic. These criteria apply equally to the provision of business services and technical services. This posting is intended to help service managers whose services are not easily billed on a transaction by transaction basis.

Simple

Simplicity implies two facets to billing:

  • the principle should be conceptually simple. All the stakeholders should understand how they will be billed
  • it should be simple to calculate the bill for services. The cost of billing is pure overhead and should be kept as low as possible. A complicated billing principle may imply complex and costly means for calculating the bill.

When a billing scheme is not simple, I have seen errors in budgeting, both on the customer and on the supplier side, as well as issues of license violation due to the difficulties in correctly calculating the service prices.

I have also seen a case where fairness would have dictated billing for a messaging system on the basis of who was sending and who was receiving messages. Although the concept was very simple, the cost of measuringuse, not to mention the potential impact on performance, made this principle unfeasible.

Unambiguous

Whatever the principle, the events the lead to the calculation of the bill should be interpretable in only one way. In general, ambiguity is a corollary to complexity.

Complete

The principle should account for 100% of the services being delivered. This means that not only should everything be accounted for; it also means that everything should be billed only once.

Completeness does not mean that everyone pays the same price. For example, the service provider might have a policy to perform certain service pro bono. The pro bono customers should be reported in the pricing and revenue calculations, even though the rate for the service might be 0.

Completeness is one of those rules where the Pareto principle does not apply. You would not think of billing only the top 20% of your customers!

Fair

The perception by the customers that the billing is fair is of utmost importance. It means that there is some clear relationship between the value of the service delivered and the price asked for the service.

Suppose you are an internal service provider charging for a service by department. Each department in your organization pays the same amount. While this principle is simple, it is likely to be very unfair. There are usually large differences in the size of a department or in the use a department makes of a specific service.

Suppose you are an external service provider charging very different prices in different countries for the same service. There might be some differences in costs that justify different prices and economic libertarians might adjust the price to whatever the market can bear. But there are numerous cases where gross price differences have led to market distortion, especially when multi-national customers buy wherever the service is cheapest.

When it comes  to fairness, the operative word is perception. There are no fixed rules for determining what is fair or unfair. Fairness is like pornography. It might be very difficult to define, but you know it when you see it.

Sustainable

The price you charge for your service is sustainable if it generates sufficient business to gain sufficient revenue to maintain your business activity. In the simplest case, this means that the price must cover the costs, at least. In a profit making enterprise, there should be a margin to cover both the profit expected by the owners, as well as to constitute reserves for managing risk and to fund, in part, business transformation. Of course, many organizations will not fund business transformation out of their own cash reserves, preferring to raise new capital or to borrow funds from banks or from bond-holders.

In more sophisticated cases, a service provider will consider the costs and revenues for an entire product line, rather than treating each product separately. They might be willing to sustain losses for one service because the delivery of that service also enables other services. The entire notion of free Internet services and free publications is based on this principle. A service provider is happy to have a large number of customers that do not pay for the services, because that large customer base enables to the service provider to charge for advertising or to resell information about the customers.

Strategic

Ideally, a price should encourage the evolution of a market in a direction desired by a specific strategy. These strategies may take many forms.

You may wish to increase market share or encourage the use of a service by lowering its price. With a lower price, but with higher use, overall revenues may increase, thereby funding improvements in the service. The customers would also be happy, getting better service at a lower price.

Price may also be used as an incentive to manage capacity requirements, offering lower prices for off-peak periods.

The time-honored concept of the loss leader encourages gaining customers in the hope of selling to them other, higher margin, services.

I have also seen the case of a service provider wanting to phase out a service but not wishing to send a negative message to long-time customers that have been happy with the service and see no reason to stop using it. Raising the price of that service is a strong incentive to encourage customers to migrate to another service—albeit with the risk of sending those customers to other suppliers.

Measuring your Pricing System

If you charge for your services, then you will surely want to measure how effective your pricing is relative to your business goals and strategies. The following table gives some metrics according to each of the billing criteria discussed above:

CriterionHow to measure
SimpleCost of the billing system; Number of billing inquiries
UnambiguousNumber of billing errors
CompleteWork orders for implementing a service that cannot be related to any bills
FairCustomer complaints; periodic customer reviews
SustainableBusiness line profitability; Market share
StrategicMeasurement of return on investment
Summary
Article Name
Principles for Billing for Services
Description
When billing for services, a principle should be adopted that is simple, unambiguous, complete, fair, sustainable and strategic. These criteria apply equally to the provision of business services and technical services
Author
Robert S. Falkowitz
Publisher Name
Concentric Circle Consulting
Publisher Logo
Concentric Circle Consulting

Filed Under: Financial management Tagged With: billing, business service, costs, financial management, invoice, profit, revenue, technical service

Subscribe to our mailing list

Click here to be the first to learn of our events and publications
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Twitter
  • xing
  • YouTube

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Kanban eLearning

Kanban training online

Recent Posts

  • The role of the problem manager
  • The Three Indicators
  • Visualization of Configurations

Tag Cloud

process definition service manager rigidity kanban value risk lean management ITSM impact flow manifesto for software development kanban board incident management tools process tools value stream knowledge work statistical control chart lead time priority lean adaptive case management manifesto Incident Management leadership waste cause knowledge management incident service request urgency change management automation change control problem flow efficiency agile ITIL bias Cost of Delay
  • Kanban eLearning
  • Services
  • Posts
  • Events
  • Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Rights & Duties
  • Personal Data

© 2014–2022 Concentric Circle Consulting · All Rights Reserved.
Concentric Circle Consulting Address
Log in

This site uses cookies . You accept those cookies when you continue to use this site. Cookie policyAllow cookiesNo 3rd party non-functional cookiesCookie policy
You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.Change cookie settings